AI presentation coaching for Subject Matter Experts

You know a lotFind the story

AI can generate polished slides in minutes, but when the emphasis is wrong, key details are missing, or the story doesn't flow, you can spend hours editing a presentation that looked finished

For the presentations experts give at work

  • Status updates
  • Research findings
  • Budget requests
  • Project reviews
  • Technical briefings
  • Team updates
  • Business cases
  • Test results
  • Project check-ins
  • Quarterly reviews
  • Options and recommendations
  • Customer insights
  • Roadmap updates
  • Pilot results
  • Resource requests
  • Lessons learned
  • Strategy updates
  • Root-cause analysis
  • Project proposals
  • Risk assessments
  • Leadership updates
  • Change proposals
  • Incident reviews
  • Go/no-go decisions

Your time adds up

What building your presentation really costs you

Move the sliders to see

8 hrs
$100

That’s

$800

worth of your time

8 hours × $100/hour

Illustrative time value based on your inputs, not guaranteed savings

…And then there’s the frustration factor

How many rounds of “No, that’s not what I meant” can you handle?

A few revisions are normal. Rebuilding the entire story is another matter

Spend your time shaping the message—not repeatedly starting over

Meet Throoli

From deep expertise to presentations that influence

Think it throo with Throoli, your AI-powered presentation coachThrough a guided conversation, Throoli helps you clarify what matters, shape your message, and develop a presentation—so your audience understands not just what you know, but why it matters

  1. Step 1

    Talk it through

  2. Step 2

    See your story

  3. Step 3

    Make it yours

  4. Step 4

    Export & build slides in your favorite tool

YourYourexpertiseexpertiseisisthethestrength.strength.PerspectivePerspectivemakesmakesititpowerfulpowerful

Your knowledge is second nature

Even an excellent AI prompt starts with what you think to include. Much of what sits behind your conclusions is implicit, shaped by evidence, context, exceptions and professional judgment

Throoli draws it out

A guided conversation brings that thinking into the open, then develops a coherent presentation you can examine as a whole

You apply your critical eye

Use one of your greatest strengths, critical review, to spot gaps, challenge the emphasis and refine the argument without losing the nuances that matter

See the result

Two connected viewsOne coherent presentation

Slide Blueprint

Speaker Guide

Welcome to your Speaker Guide

Your slides show the story. This guide helps you tell it.

Phased transition for internal request management

For the steering group · about 10 minutes

Your story in a nutshell

Your case is that the immediate request problems cannot wait, but a broad upgrade to the current system could consume scarce Q1 resources and delay the strategic move you believe is needed. You propose essential fixes alongside a structured platform evaluation, with the full replacement decision reserved for a later business case. The steering group can therefore support the direction now without committing prematurely to the investment.

01 — The story in a nutshell · 0:55

We have an immediate operating problem in the way internal requests enter the process, find an owner and receive follow-up. We also have a longer-term question about whether the current system can provide the automation, reporting and user experience we need.

02 — What is breaking · 1:35

The audit gives us a clear starting point. Almost one request in four lacked essential information at intake. About one in six was reassigned at least once, which means avoidable handling before work could settle with the right team.

03 — Why neither full option fits · 1:50

The comparison shows why a simple choice between the two full options would be misleading. Improving the current system is estimated at $62,000, requires 220 to 280 IT hours and could produce a first release in eight to ten weeks. On those figures, it is the only complete option that could fit the current limits.

04 — How the transition works · 1:35

The phased route separates what cannot wait from what still needs evidence. First, we define and deliver only the changes needed for a working Q1 improvement. The combined commitment must remain within the existing funding and IT-hour limits, and we should avoid work that would materially delay or duplicate a replacement.

05 — What replacement must prove · 1:50

The evaluation should start with operational fit, not a product feature list. The first test is whether people can submit complete requests through channels they will actually use. A platform with more capability will not help if work continues to arrive informally or the intake design creates avoidable friction.

06 — What to authorize now · 2:15

There are three distinct decisions here. Today, the group can endorse a new platform as the strategic direction and support the phased route: essential Q1 fixes together with a bounded platform evaluation. That does not approve a platform purchase or implementation.

The impact

Help your ideas travel

Big ideas. Bigger breakthroosA compelling presentation is only the beginning. The real impact comes when your expertise shapes understanding, decisions, and what happens next

01

For you

Give your work the impact it deserves

You’ve invested deeply in your work. Help your insights reach the people who matter, influence important conversations, and make a difference beyond your own role

02

For your organization

Make expert knowledge go further

Make specialist knowledge accessible across teams, so valuable insights don’t stay within one function — they inform decisions, guide action, and create value across the organization

Ready to find your story?

Think first. Build with purpose

Request beta access

Additional options

Need Throoli in your own environment?

We’re exploring additional deployment options for organizations

Only updates about organizational access · Privacy Policy